publié dans le European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7/1 (2015)
mercredi 30 septembre 2015,
The argument from ignorance mounted by John Schellenberg argues from the existence of non-faulty unbelief to the non-existence of God, from the fact of atheism or agnosticism to the truth of atheism. It relies on two putative conceptual relations : between the idea of love and that of personal relationship, and between personal relationship and existential belief on each side of the relation concerning the other relatum. I argue that each is debatable, and so the argument cannot proceed.
Professeur. Métaphysique, philosophie de la religion, philosophie médiévale.
Courrier électronique : Cyrille Michon
Enquête sur la liberté humaine
Foi et croyances religieuses
Philosophie n. 145 (mars 2020), p. 102-120
Revue Thomiste 119 (2019 n°4) : p. 531-576
Lectures de la Somme de théologie, IIa-IIae, q. 64, a. 7
Encyclopédie philosophique en ligne
University of Notre Dame (IN), 21-23 Jan. 2018
in J.-B. Guillon, Le libre arbitre. Approches contemporaines.
Religious Studies 53 (3), 2017, 387-401
Numéro Spécial pour les 80 ans de R. Swinburne
Peter van Inwagen
Traduction de Cyrille Michon